SpruceItUp wrote: 04:21 pm Mar 17 2026
I have RAD valve on my CR125 and it works great. It has quite the quality feel to it, especially because it is made of aluminum and not plastic like the VF3 on my KDX.
Performance wise I have no clue as they're on two different bikes, but I may pick up a RAD valve for my KDX. It is a really well built product. And the fact that the intake manifold is all aluminum and the boot on it is easy to find makes it worth it.
Chuck, you say the RAD valve behaves differently than the VF3, in what way does it do so that makes you like it?
Thanks
The RAD Valve is obviously the better design/build quality, with a generically replaceable coupling to connect the carburetor, instead of the OEM molded intake manifold boot.
The VForce has a quicker throttle response on the low end, but the RAD Valve has power gains everywhere else that the VForce3 does, and seems to smooth out the hit when the power valve opens a bit better, although this could be due to differences in atomization through the higher velocity through it.
Apparently the rad valve with the upgraded carbon fiber reads response on the low end exactly the same as the V-Force3.
The RAD Valve's reed placement angle is a bit greater, causing the reeds to have to bend further, although durability of the reeds seems to be a non-issue. The VForce3 places the reeds at a more relaxed angle so that they do not have to open as far, and they have a larger reed area.
There have been a few complaints of people saying that the plastic VForce reed cages are able to be easily distorted and sometimes show up new from the factory with a slight distortion so that the reeds do not seem to seat fully closed on them.
I'm very likely picking up another RAD Valve from a member here, but also would like to pick up a new Moto Tassinari VForce4 reed cage to compare and try out.
In the past, it seems the VForce3 performance has been preferred in the KDX community, but with the carbon fiber reed petal upgrade, perhaps this was a non-issue.