Page 1 of 1

debating

Posted: 11:26 am Sep 22 2016
by javjacob
New guy here from Missouri. I have been debating heavily on whether or not I should buy a KDX since I already have a sport quad. I have just gotten bored of the quad and don't care too much for the 4 stroke maintenance/expense. I haven't ridden a bike in over 10 years I would bet. I am 30 years old, 5' 8" and about 150 lbs. The KDX I am interested in is a 2001 KDX 220 that is stock and appears to be in really good condition.

Re: debating

Posted: 11:48 am Sep 22 2016
by KDXGarage
Welcome to the forums.

We are a bit biased around here, so you won't find many to say you should not get a KDX.

Re: debating

Posted: 11:54 am Sep 22 2016
by two-stroke-brit
I think depending on how much it is $$$ ,you cant go wrong .

debating

Posted: 01:02 pm Sep 22 2016
by javjacob
The price is 1,500 but I am thinking of offering 1,400 since its late in the season. I am just a bit nervous to get back on a bike and realize how much of my bike riding skills I have lost but time will fix that I am sure. I used to be fearless on a bike in my early teenage years. How do these bikes handle the big hillclimbs?

Re: debating

Posted: 02:49 pm Sep 22 2016
by Tyl3r
I took a 2 or 3 year break from bikes and rode the snot out of my sport quad. I loved it, got very used to it, and felt I was pretty fast on it. Then I Started getting bored with it, and noticed a lot of shortcomings in comparison to bikes. So I got another KDX. It only took a ride or two to get used to the change in handling again. By the 3rd or 4th ride, I wasn't completely back into it, but comfortable enough to ride in a group and not hold anyone back.

It does take some time to get used to the change, but its not that long and its not that hard to adapt. Just have to put in some seat time. Once you start riding again, you will see that it will all come back to you again.

My 220 is awesome with hill climbs. It has so much bottom end, its hard to stall it. I do not think you will be unhappy with your purchase. Only thing I have to say is, if you buy the 220, check it IMMEDIATELY to see if it has a stock or aftermarket piston in it. The stock pistons are cast aluminum and are prone to failures. The skirt will start to crack and break off without warning. You have to run an aftermarket forged one in there, like a Wiseco (look around for more on here for more info if you'd like... I learned the hard way)

Re: debating

Posted: 06:32 pm Sep 22 2016
by diymirage
I would take a 200 over a 220 anyday
and 1400 seems steep to me, specially since you will need to put a new piston in, if its running a stocker

Re: debating

Posted: 08:00 pm Sep 22 2016
by Julien D
Jason wrote:Welcome to the forums.

We are a bit biased around here, so you won't find many to say you should not get a KDX.

yeah, this.

Re: debating

Posted: 08:24 pm Sep 22 2016
by doakley
LOL! Just a BIT biased ya' think?
BTW, I've ridden both and I prefer the low end grunt of the 220. Much easier to ride and more forgiving power. To each his own.

Here's the deal though. No one has asked the gentleman what he wants to do with the new bike. Ride trails with his buddies? Race? What kind or trails and terrain. Open fast trails, I'd opt for a newer bike with more modern suspension. Tight trails with less fast open stuff, the KDX is tough to beat. Truth is , it's 80% rider and 20% the bike so get whatever will make you really want to ride it next weekend, and the next and the next..........

debating

Posted: 01:23 am Sep 23 2016
by javjacob
Thanks for the replies everyone. I am mostly going to be riding trails and what not. I don't plan on doing any racing. The ride ability of the kdx is what is appealing to me along with the simplicity of the 2 stroke motor. Finger lakes in Columbia MO is one of the riding areas I ride at, to give an example. I have been eye balling the KTM 300xc but they are a bit pricey. What is a fair price for a really nice 01 KDX220? There is also a nice looking 95 KDX200 asking 1200. I can make an offer on either one.

Re: debating

Posted: 11:36 pm Sep 23 2016
by Julien D
to simplify, the 200 is a bit more snappy in the higher rev range, and it revs farther. The 220 is more focused on low end torque. Mod either one and you can do whatever you want with either. Pretty much rock solid, and way more reliable than any KTM I have ever known. 95 - 06 are all the same bike so shop on condition, not year. 1200 for a 95 sounds good if it's clean and well kept. If you look at a 220 keep in mind you will want to put a forged piston in it first thing, so that will add to the purchase price.

Re: debating

Posted: 12:43 am Sep 25 2016
by javjacob
I ended up getting the 2001 KDX 220 for $1200. Can't wait to ride it tomorrow! I will start a thread and post some pics.

Re: debating

Posted: 04:56 pm Sep 25 2016
by Julien D
Change that piston ASAP. Seriously, like, before you take it out on a ride.

Re: debating

Posted: 08:38 pm Sep 25 2016
by javjacob
How do I know if it has the stock piston or aftermarket? The guy said the previous owner did the top end on it. Can I remove the pipe and check through the cylinder port?

Re: debating

Posted: 10:45 am Sep 27 2016
by KDXSPODE
I hit "quick reply" for a reason.
Yes!

Re: debating

Posted: 12:13 pm Sep 27 2016
by Julien D
It's pretty impossible to tell through the exhaust port. You really have to pop the head and look at the piston crown. We have another member who is currently dealing with a complete engine rebuild do to having bought a 220 which the previous owner claimed had a new top end with forged piston. That ended up being false, and the stock piston grenaded and left shrapnel in the bottom end.

Re: debating

Posted: 01:43 pm Sep 27 2016
by javjacob
Looks like I will be getting a Wiseco piston and rings after I tear it apart and see the condition of the cylinder.