Re: Planning on Millennium Technologies 225 kit
Posted: 06:41 am Mar 17 2025
That info you referenced of mine was a copy&paste quote from Ron Black's older posts on this forum.
One could adjust the radius cutter with the head on a lathe so that a tighter radius was cut between the inner edge of the squish band and the top of the chamber nearing the spark plug hole, to reduce compression of a milled head to increase volume, without taking as much from the spark plug thread area top of chamber... But I'd be afraid that'd make for less efficient combustion.
What octane requirements does Millennium give with their kits? That could explain it if they recommend 93 octane etc. I get away with 90 octane non-ethanol (I'm loving Pennsylvania's Sheetz gas stations moving into Ohio with cheap diesel and affordable non-ethanol 90!) just fine on my Ron Black head.
Ron Black states he keeps the head volume *almost* stock in order to avoid the need for race fuel or octane booster (I believe he recommended 91 octane still? Check that though), and to avoid shortening the service life of the engine.
Higher compression will give more torque and low end throttle response, but also higher cylinder pressures and more loading on the big end rod bearings, so the bottom end rebuild frequency may be slightly increased (a lot of our bikes are out there running on 32:1 on stock bottom ends still 20-25+ years later still though, fwiw).
One could adjust the radius cutter with the head on a lathe so that a tighter radius was cut between the inner edge of the squish band and the top of the chamber nearing the spark plug hole, to reduce compression of a milled head to increase volume, without taking as much from the spark plug thread area top of chamber... But I'd be afraid that'd make for less efficient combustion.
What octane requirements does Millennium give with their kits? That could explain it if they recommend 93 octane etc. I get away with 90 octane non-ethanol (I'm loving Pennsylvania's Sheetz gas stations moving into Ohio with cheap diesel and affordable non-ethanol 90!) just fine on my Ron Black head.
Ron Black states he keeps the head volume *almost* stock in order to avoid the need for race fuel or octane booster (I believe he recommended 91 octane still? Check that though), and to avoid shortening the service life of the engine.
Higher compression will give more torque and low end throttle response, but also higher cylinder pressures and more loading on the big end rod bearings, so the bottom end rebuild frequency may be slightly increased (a lot of our bikes are out there running on 32:1 on stock bottom ends still 20-25+ years later still though, fwiw).