What rear shock spring rate?
- KDXGarage
- KDXRider.net
- Posts: 14130
- Joined: 06:45 am Nov 01 2004
- Country: United States of America
- Location: AL, USA
- Contact:
Re: What rear shock spring rate?
5.8 on a 1992 model?? Surely not. Check your sag with whatever is on there now.
In the USA, 1989 - 1994 fork springs are .30. Look at Kawasaki's website.
In the USA, 1989 - 1994 fork springs are .30. Look at Kawasaki's website.
Thank you for participating on kdxrider.net.
To post pictures from a device: viewtopic.php?f=88&t=24128
To post pictures from a device: viewtopic.php?f=88&t=24128
-
- Member
- Posts: 177
- Joined: 01:05 pm Mar 10 2013
- Country:
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Re: What rear shock spring rate?
Not sure where you got im on a 92, in my first post I said I have an 06.Jason wrote:5.8 on a 1992 model?? Surely not. Check your sag with whatever is on there now.
In the USA, 1989 - 1994 fork springs are .30. Look at Kawasaki's website.
- KDXGarage
- KDXRider.net
- Posts: 14130
- Joined: 06:45 am Nov 01 2004
- Country: United States of America
- Location: AL, USA
- Contact:
Re: What rear shock spring rate?
Sorry. I thought it was Biteennit 's reply.
Thank you for participating on kdxrider.net.
To post pictures from a device: viewtopic.php?f=88&t=24128
To post pictures from a device: viewtopic.php?f=88&t=24128
-
- Member
- Posts: 360
- Joined: 11:44 pm Jul 12 2014
- Country:
- Location: Cambodia
Re: What rear shock spring rate?
Once again, thank you for a very informative reply. Would you say getting new springs is as good as getting KX forks? Or the next best thing?Jason wrote:Thanks for updating your location profile. I keep meaning to type up some thoughtful new thread to encourage everyone to post his country, as some models (like yours and the forks) are different and mot people on here are in the USA and just think about the USA bikes and what characteristics the USA bikes had. I had no clue the G?? model had USD forks back in 1992 until I looked up the frame number for you.
The Honda XR fork springs WILL NOT work in "what we in the USA call 1993 - 1994 USD forks". I used to have a paying hobby suspension service and test fit various springs in the 1993 - 1994 USA USD forks. Race Tech 3647 model is THE BEST choice of all the springs I tried / used. Race Tech and FRP Offroad are the ONLY aftermarket springs that I found to work.
The preload length was about right, as far as I remember. Current preload amounts are a little less than a few years back (4mm instead of 10mm on the Race Tech site), but they are still the best option.
USA Honda XR250 springs were too short, as best I remember. Check spring length before taking a chance.
In the USA, the 1989 - 1994 springs are .30Kg/mm rate. Basically, ball point pen springs.
On the rear spring, 1989+ sprigs are all interchangeable. Drive over to the house, and I will give you one. I know.
What is the actual weight of your bike? I am only used to spring rates on the 233 pound E models. If your bike has the steel tank, blinkers, speedometer, etc., (can't remember if they were still on or not), then it may be a touch heavier.
In the USA, the stock 1989 - 1994 "E" model KDX200 shock spring is a 4.6 Kg/mm rate. Assuming your swingarm, linkage and such does not cause a different need, then a 4.8 rate may be what you need.
*******and Cannon Racecraft***************** (just saw 6riders post)
I got excited thinking I could use stock XR400 springs, but then I saw that you say these WILL NOT fit. The Race Tech springs come with with different preload spacers if I understand correctly so adjusting preload/sag shouldn't be a problem?
I'll have to check the weight of my bike to be honest. The blinkers and footpegs have been taken off. I have a plastic tank (so someone removed the metal one). Pretty sure it weighs virtually the same as an E-series, but for shits and giggles and when the time comes, I'll try to balance it on a scale to get an idea of the wet weight (minus gas). According to Race Tech, I would need .44 springs. It varies from 42.6 or so (180lbs) to 44.2 depending on the stats I put (185-190 TALL RIDER). So I might go for .44 since the bike probably weighs a tiny bit more and in case I gain a bit of weight, though I also don't want the ride to be too hard. If I ride a lot of bumpy terrain, is it better to get softer suspension?
As for the rear shocks, that makes it easy! Seems like KDX's also have interchangeable rear shocks? Race Tech shocks seem to be compatible with many different makes/models (SRSP 622850)... Do you recommend changing the rear shocks or are the OEM ok? You say the OEM are 4.6 Kg/mm and that 4.8 would be ok (so slighly stiffer). But here is what Race Tech recommends:
REAR SHOCK SPRINGS
Recommended Shock Spring Rate: 5.1 kg/mm (use closest available)
Stock Shock Spring Rate: 4.6 kg/mm (stock)
Is 5.0 too stiff? Would 4.6 be better? I've never used aftermarket suspension before (I usually just get used to what stock offers me, lol). I ride through everything: fast straight/slightly bumpy lines, very rocky terrain (sometimes), some mud but usually hard bumpy surfaces (some big dips).FRONT FORK SPRINGS
Recommended Fork Spring Rate: 0.442 kg/mm (use closest available)
Stock Fork Spring Rate: 0.296 kg/mm(stock)
- 6 Riders
- Gold Member
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: 12:58 pm May 01 2013
- Country: USA
- Location: Washington
- Contact:
Re: What rear shock spring rate?
IMO for "Bumpy" soft is better. I noticed on Racetechs site, that MX uses a softer fork spring than trail, must be for landing the table tops?
THERE is nothing that you can do to a KDX fork that will make it even close to what a KX fork is. BUT, for trail riding at slower (not pinned in 3rd/4th gear) paces, the stock KDX fork with good springs and proper oil viscosity and level will do you just fine. I don't have a problem with my 93 forks until I hit speeds on the trail and braking bumps get a little tiring.
THERE is nothing that you can do to a KDX fork that will make it even close to what a KX fork is. BUT, for trail riding at slower (not pinned in 3rd/4th gear) paces, the stock KDX fork with good springs and proper oil viscosity and level will do you just fine. I don't have a problem with my 93 forks until I hit speeds on the trail and braking bumps get a little tiring.
newbbewb wrote:^what he said.
*side note...I'm drunk, so try to read what I'm trying to say, instead of what I actually typemasterblaster wrote:Man 6 riders you rock.
- KDXGarage
- KDXRider.net
- Posts: 14130
- Joined: 06:45 am Nov 01 2004
- Country: United States of America
- Location: AL, USA
- Contact:
Re: What rear shock spring rate?
biteeinit, I would think .42 and a 4.8.
The shock springs fit a lot of bikes. The shock itself does not.
The shock springs fit a lot of bikes. The shock itself does not.
Thank you for participating on kdxrider.net.
To post pictures from a device: viewtopic.php?f=88&t=24128
To post pictures from a device: viewtopic.php?f=88&t=24128
-
- Member
- Posts: 360
- Joined: 11:44 pm Jul 12 2014
- Country:
- Location: Cambodia
Re: What rear shock spring rate?
A quick bump here. Looking at the Fredette site, it seems he recommends a 0.38KG spring for anyone 150-200lbs... Racetech recommends 0.42. Why is there such a big difference? Are .42s going to be ridiculously hard (geared towards jumps and the likes)? I can't even find .38 racetechs... Is Fredette talking about a different brand (though spring rates should be the same, no?).
http://www.frpoffroad.com/aboutus.htm
http://www.frpoffroad.com/aboutus.htm
- KDXGarage
- KDXRider.net
- Posts: 14130
- Joined: 06:45 am Nov 01 2004
- Country: United States of America
- Location: AL, USA
- Contact:
Re: What rear shock spring rate?
His spring rates may include the stock amount of preload from 20 - 25 years ago thinking on preload. Modern preload is small. The springs carry the weight of the bike and rider at the correct height. Valving will control jumping vs. putting through an easy trail.
Thank you for participating on kdxrider.net.
To post pictures from a device: viewtopic.php?f=88&t=24128
To post pictures from a device: viewtopic.php?f=88&t=24128
-
- Member
- Posts: 177
- Joined: 01:05 pm Mar 10 2013
- Country:
- Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Re: What rear shock spring rate?
After running .42 and 5.8 last weekend I recommend them for a 220lb rider. Woot! What a change.
Different bike. So much more stable. Yes I did change to KX125 forks. May need to reduce shims on the mid stack as it deflects off roots a bit.
Different bike. So much more stable. Yes I did change to KX125 forks. May need to reduce shims on the mid stack as it deflects off roots a bit.
- 6 Riders
- Gold Member
- Posts: 2124
- Joined: 12:58 pm May 01 2013
- Country: USA
- Location: Washington
- Contact:
Re: What rear shock spring rate?
If you play with Racetech's spring estimator a bit, you will see that if you are riding motocross, the rate goes down (softer). Anyways, I had my forks built for me...I was 160# and had him set them up for a "B" rider in dessert terrain....He put .41 springs in and I would say that they are perfect. I think that Fredette is a just little on the light side for NON-racers.
newbbewb wrote:^what he said.
*side note...I'm drunk, so try to read what I'm trying to say, instead of what I actually typemasterblaster wrote:Man 6 riders you rock.
-
- Member
- Posts: 360
- Joined: 11:44 pm Jul 12 2014
- Country:
- Location: Cambodia
Re: What rear shock spring rate?
Thanks all. Seems .42kg is good. If I don't like them I'll just sell them to someone with an XR400...
Cool. Did you ever get gold valves for your USDs? I don't think upgrading to KX forks or getting new valves would make a big difference in my case. I'm getting the bike parts next week (a guy is bringing them over... Been waiting almost a month). Next weekend I'm finally going to take it for a long ride and see how it feels. If I really hate the shocks, then I'll order those springs ASAP. Might wait out on the rear spring if I like it. Can't wait...Jason wrote:His spring rates may include the stock amount of preload from 20 - 25 years ago thinking on preload. Modern preload is small. The springs carry the weight of the bike and rider at the correct height. Valving will control jumping vs. putting through an easy trail.