TheJackRabbit wrote:that's a 200, also on the opposite side of the 1742 number on the intake housing it will say 198 or 216, 198 is the 200, 216 is the 220
Thank you! I'm assuming that's 196.8 CC's? Also, any way to tell the year of this engine?
The year isn't a huge thing, being that all the H series are pretty much the same. I will say by the low serial # (6694) probably a 96.
My 95's # is 2619
newbbewb wrote:^what he said.
masterblaster wrote:Man 6 riders you rock.
*side note...I'm drunk, so try to read what I'm trying to say, instead of what I actually type
6 Riders wrote:The year isn't a huge thing, being that all the H series are pretty much the same. I will say by the low serial # (6694) probably a 96.
My 95's # is 2619
The reason I ask is that I was told this was a 2005 engine and want to see if there is any validity to that claim.
I would say there is just about zero chance of that being a 2005. As far as I know, the engine numbers are sequential. Being that yours is in the 6000 range it's probably within the first few years of the H series release.
s10gto wrote:Looks like a bikemaster plug with magnet.
Looks like the crushwasher is too small even though the inner diameter is too large.
Oh, it's added to the "fixing stupid" list. If anyone knows of a decent method to look up an engine serial number to find out what year it is, please let me know. Thanks! From what I've seen online, the 10th digit is supposed to denote the year, which would make this an '06. But I'm not sure.
You can be confident that its mid-late 90's. As mentioned, the year doesn't really matter. Since 95+ they are all the same. They put stiffer clutch springs in the 96, that's it. I know having a newer motor may seem like a plus, but in this case, it just doesn't matter much.