kx fork shim stack configuration
-
- Member
- Posts: 358
- Joined: 09:12 pm Nov 30 2009
- Country:
- Location: Singapore
kx fork shim stack configuration
Hi, i have recently reconfigure my 05kx125 BV shim stack. I have done a 2 stage stack to soften up the fork and to reduce low and high speed harsness.
low speed stack : 24mm, 24mm and 14mm
high speed stack : 22mm, 20mm, 18mm, 16mm, 14mm, 12mm and 11.
my doubt is will my stack configuration too weak? i have removed 5 x24mm of shim in each fork but have yet to test things out. any opinion and expericence to share? thanks.
low speed stack : 24mm, 24mm and 14mm
high speed stack : 22mm, 20mm, 18mm, 16mm, 14mm, 12mm and 11.
my doubt is will my stack configuration too weak? i have removed 5 x24mm of shim in each fork but have yet to test things out. any opinion and expericence to share? thanks.
A true KDX customizer!!
- Tedh98
- Supporting Member II
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: 01:08 pm Mar 20 2009
- Country:
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
- Contact:
I don't know enough about suspensions to be able to look at a stack and tell how it is going to perform, so I can't help you there.
But I have been told by others that have a lot of suspension experience that the .15 shims in your HS stack are way too stiff for forks. I've ordered some .1 shims to replace those .15's. The stack I'll be testing soon has almost the same LS as factory, but the HS will be much softer. We'll see how that goes.
It sounds like you've already made this change. If the bike is ready to ride, you should go ahead and test it out. At least you'll know how that stack feels and will be better able to determine what the next step(s) will be.
But I have been told by others that have a lot of suspension experience that the .15 shims in your HS stack are way too stiff for forks. I've ordered some .1 shims to replace those .15's. The stack I'll be testing soon has almost the same LS as factory, but the HS will be much softer. We'll see how that goes.
It sounds like you've already made this change. If the bike is ready to ride, you should go ahead and test it out. At least you'll know how that stack feels and will be better able to determine what the next step(s) will be.
-
- Member
- Posts: 358
- Joined: 09:12 pm Nov 30 2009
- Country:
- Location: Singapore
- Tedh98
- Supporting Member II
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: 01:08 pm Mar 20 2009
- Country:
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
- Contact:
Here is a very small ride report:
http://kdxrider.net/forums/viewtopic.ph ... highlight=
I've only gone riding once since then and that was with my 8 year old daughter. While she was riding around on the pee wee track, I was off to the side riding over and hitting some logs at different speeds. I was happy with those results, but I really need to go out for a good ride to really test it out.
http://kdxrider.net/forums/viewtopic.ph ... highlight=
I've only gone riding once since then and that was with my 8 year old daughter. While she was riding around on the pee wee track, I was off to the side riding over and hitting some logs at different speeds. I was happy with those results, but I really need to go out for a good ride to really test it out.
-
- Member
- Posts: 358
- Joined: 09:12 pm Nov 30 2009
- Country:
- Location: Singapore
- Tedh98
- Supporting Member II
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: 01:08 pm Mar 20 2009
- Country:
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
- Contact:
-
- Member
- Posts: 358
- Joined: 09:12 pm Nov 30 2009
- Country:
- Location: Singapore
I am 65kg without gear. About 75kg with gear. riding condition mainly some rocky rooty terrain. some open flat sandy trail with lots of those corners.
2005 KX 125 48mmUSD
my current stack is a 2 stage. 24, 24, 14, 22, 20, 18, 16, 14, 12, 11
after testing, i still find my low speed and high speed over rocky terrain harsh. the fork refuse to soak up enough of the impact. thanks for any finding.
2005 KX 125 48mmUSD
my current stack is a 2 stage. 24, 24, 14, 22, 20, 18, 16, 14, 12, 11
after testing, i still find my low speed and high speed over rocky terrain harsh. the fork refuse to soak up enough of the impact. thanks for any finding.
A true KDX customizer!!
- Tedh98
- Supporting Member II
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: 01:08 pm Mar 20 2009
- Country:
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
- Contact:
- Tedh98
- Supporting Member II
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: 01:08 pm Mar 20 2009
- Country:
- Location: Atlanta, Georgia
- Contact:
I've got two views, each comparing your stack to the factory stack (I'll list the factory stack at the bottom, the US version may be different than what you started with).
The first graph is set at a harder impact, your stack is in yellow and is softer than factory.
The 2nd graph is at a lower impact and shows in more detail the transition from low speed to high speed.
I've tested some stacks that look similar to yours and wasn't happy. Rocks and roots were still rough and I bottomed out was too easily. In doing some reading, I came to the conclusion that my low speed was set so soft that the forks were riding too low. That would cause them to be harsh and bottom out on jumps and g-outs.
On my blog I've got a page of my ongoing experiences with revalving my forks. Near the end I've got graphs of my current set-up to compare to what I've listed for yours.
Disclaimer - my only experience with suspension tuning has been with my bike, internet research and my own trial and error. Put another way, I'm really not qualified to give tuning advice.
If you are up to experimenting, I would disable the bladders and with your stack I would try beefing up the low speed and softening the high speed. Don't forget to test different air gaps. I always bring a syringe and extra fork oil. I start with the biggest air gap and then add oil through the bleed hole to test different air gaps while I'm out riding.
Here is the factory US stack that was on my bike.
7 - 24.1
1 - 14.1
1 - 12.1
1 - 24.1
1 - 22.15
1 - 20.15
1 - 18.15
1 - 16.15
1 - 14.15
1 - 11.25
The first graph is set at a harder impact, your stack is in yellow and is softer than factory.
The 2nd graph is at a lower impact and shows in more detail the transition from low speed to high speed.
I've tested some stacks that look similar to yours and wasn't happy. Rocks and roots were still rough and I bottomed out was too easily. In doing some reading, I came to the conclusion that my low speed was set so soft that the forks were riding too low. That would cause them to be harsh and bottom out on jumps and g-outs.
On my blog I've got a page of my ongoing experiences with revalving my forks. Near the end I've got graphs of my current set-up to compare to what I've listed for yours.
Disclaimer - my only experience with suspension tuning has been with my bike, internet research and my own trial and error. Put another way, I'm really not qualified to give tuning advice.
If you are up to experimenting, I would disable the bladders and with your stack I would try beefing up the low speed and softening the high speed. Don't forget to test different air gaps. I always bring a syringe and extra fork oil. I start with the biggest air gap and then add oil through the bleed hole to test different air gaps while I'm out riding.
Here is the factory US stack that was on my bike.
7 - 24.1
1 - 14.1
1 - 12.1
1 - 24.1
1 - 22.15
1 - 20.15
1 - 18.15
1 - 16.15
1 - 14.15
1 - 11.25
-
- Member
- Posts: 358
- Joined: 09:12 pm Nov 30 2009
- Country:
- Location: Singapore