Toast?

Now, what kind'a jerk response is that??
Re: 'I don't know what the grease is really used for...'
From the web: 'Dielectric grease is a NON-conducting grease that seals out moisture and therefore prevents corrosion on electrical connectors.'
Partly.
There's this:
The application of any sort of a nonconductive grease to the actual contacts themselves can't help them make better contact at that point. You have to hope the grease gets squeezed out of the way so the two conductors can make contact. Any grease left in there is going to reduce the contact, not improve it.
If the contacts are not perfectly clean, you'd be better off using something like WD-40 on them. WD-40 is designed to restore electrical contacts. It is a decent solvent and will get rid of a lot of corrosion and dirt in the contacts.
If the contacts are open and exposed to the air and water, it may make sense to apply a grease covering to them after the connection has been made. The grease then just acts as a sealant to keep out water and air, and may prevent corrosion from occurring.
__________________________________
I've seen written instructions that make it clear to not put such a grease ON the actual connection, but put it on OVER the connection. Some applications make that clearly impossible...like grease-filled wire nuts used in irrigation valve connections.
Take note of the
air part in the above. In dissimilar metal applications (aluminum wire with any ferrous clamp/holder/ferrule) you want to keep air away from the connection.
Application of any grease is going to be a dirt catcher...and the taillight is a great place to 'see' dirt/dust/mud/junk. Cleaning that socket when it's full of grease
and dirt is going to be problematic.
I'd vote for the WD-40 idea.
Take a look at the lens gasket and the wire entry grommet. Make sure they do what they're supposed to. A bit of RTV around that grommet will keep a lot of dirt out.
+++++++++++++++++++++
This is funny. In a forum where this is discussed (application of dielectric grease), there's this:
I installed some 65/100 watt headlamps and the connectors fried.
With a response of:
I am surprised. A 65/100-watt is not much power. In a 12-volt system a current flow of only 54-milliamperes is needed to provide the power.
That is an incorrect response. The guy is politely corrected...but he retorts with a DEFENSE of his original calculation.
54ma gets you 100 watts with 12V?
WoW! I need to let the power company know about this. They have been overcharging (ha) me for my power use at home for YEARS!!!
I think it was better he be thought a fool than for him to open his mouth and remove all doubt.
BTW...54ma at 12V gets you LESS than a watt:
One equation concerning power says
P=IE: Power (in watts) = Current (in amps) <multiplied by> Voltage.
.054(amps/current) x 12(volts) = .648 (watts/power).