KDXRIDER.NET

I can't see it taking to long before snagging on a branch.

do you not have enough room to run it on the inside of the fork? the cr style goes between the fork and the wheel. that looks worse than the normal kx routing.

It's on a KX250F on eBay not mine. Just something I noticed that didn't look quite right.

Looks like it would only be a matter of time before the line caught on something.

Here's a quick one Dave..

Some of the KTM's get routed that way. I agree though. Looks like an accident waiting to happen.

What's with all the BS pics?

the line is supposed to be ran on the inside just lets you know the guy who owns it knows nothing

BS pics?

Indawoods wrote:What's with all the BS pics?

It looks like Trev is working on getting an anamated avitar for Dave, like he did for my monkey!! First try was with an arm wave, second is blinky eyes.

BTW Trev; I recommend you try and reduce the size of your signature photo. It chews up way too much page when you have several post/replies. I got rid of my big one and left the little monkey scratching his head.

Also I LOVE yours now!!! But I recommend KX forks for better travel. Doesn't look to be enough for that fat kangaroo ass of yours!!

OK... didn't realize that. There was no mention of it....

KayDeeExer - It looks like you alone, are attempting to extend a generation of KDXs for another generation of riders. While someone may have told you about the Birds and Bees apparently part of the story of cross pollenation was left out. LOL

skipro3 wrote:

Indawoods wrote:What's with all the BS pics?

BTW Trev; I recommend you try and reduce the size of your signature photo. It chews up way too much page when you have several post/replies...

I like how they do it at Advrider. Your sig only shows up in your first post in a thread

I think a sig should be just that... a blurb... not pics. It doesn't look good to me.

skipro3 wrote: It looks like Trev is working on getting an anamated avitar for Dave, like he did for my monkey!! First try was with an arm wave, second is blinky eyes.

That's it, didn't mean to upset anyone with my BS pics.....

skipro3 wrote:BTW Trev; I recommend you try and reduce the size of your signature photo. It chews up way too much page when you have several post/replies. I got rid of my big one and left the little monkey scratching his head.

No problem.

skipro3 wrote:Also I LOVE yours now!!! But I recommend KX forks for better travel. Doesn't look to be enough for that fat kangaroo ass of yours!!

Thanks for the compliment BUT then I take back the thanks for insulting my fine furry figure. I am on a straw and hay diet from now on... FAT indeed....

How do you like this one Dave ??? hehe

http://img68.imageshack.us/img68/2029/marvin11ua.gif



JFTR Is there an issue with posting pictures if they are hosted elsewhere ???

What's with all the graphic material? Tone it down Trev!

Indawoods wrote:What's with all the graphic material? Tone it down Trev!

That is why is asked.....

KAY DEE EXER wrote:JFTR Is there an issue with posting pictures if they are hosted elsewhere ???

Is there a difference between posting pics hosted elsewhere and posting a link ??

If there is an issue with posting pics all you have to do is make it known. Other forums I frequent have no issues with it and thought the same applied here, my mistake...

Do you really think we want to see a 'roos nut sack?