Page 1 of 1
More low end???
Posted: 03:52 pm Mar 10 2016
by olsonanthony16
My name is Anthony. I have owned a 1994 Kdx 200 for about two years and it's the first 2 stroke I've ever owned. FMF gnarly pipe says it can only fit a 95 and up. I was wondering if it would fit on my bike since not too many things change with the Kdx.thanks
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
Re: More low end???
Posted: 04:07 pm Mar 10 2016
by david
No, it won't fit. You have an E series (88-94), that is for an H series (95-06)
Re: More low end???
Posted: 04:10 pm Mar 10 2016
by olsonanthony16
Thanks I guess I'll buy the fatty pipe. I folded my pipe on a rock in a creek.
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
Re: More low end???
Posted: 04:14 pm Mar 10 2016
by olsonanthony16
Is there any recommended pipes for my bike.
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
Re: More low end???
Posted: 04:23 pm Mar 10 2016
by david
The Fatty is a good one. I think that, and the DG 11-8207 are you only options anymore.
Re: More low end???
Posted: 04:33 pm Mar 10 2016
by Julien D
DG, FMF fatty, and PC platinum are your only choices. Havent seen a PC for a long time. You can find the FMF on Ebay, and the DG on dirtoverstock.com.
Re: More low end???
Posted: 04:44 pm Mar 10 2016
by david
One member last year compared the FMF and the DG on his C series air cooled. Said the DG hit harder in the midrange and top end. I don't know if that is true on the E series. But for the price difference and the fact that the FMF is nickle plated, I would go with the FMF.
Re: More low end???
Posted: 05:05 pm Mar 10 2016
by olsonanthony16
Thanks guys it helps alot.
Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
Re: More low end???
Posted: 08:17 am Mar 11 2016
by Julien D
david wrote:One member last year compared the FMF and the DG on his C series air cooled. Said the DG hit harder in the midrange and top end. I don't know if that is true on the E series. But for the price difference and the fact that the FMF is nickle plated, I would go with the FMF.
I think that's pretty accurate. I ran both back to back on my E. They were pretty similar, but the FMF may have had an edge down low where the DG was focused on mid range. Not a huge difference.