Page 1 of 2
Wifes first Dirt Bike: KX100 or KDX
Posted: 11:45 am Jul 13 2011
by UI Vandal
Background on wife
Weight: 140
Height: 5'6"
Age: 25
Live in Idaho so trails vary greatly: Went riding this weekend in high desert, along mountain ridges, some sandy areas. Single track, forest roads, atv trails, wide open, etc. Everything is available and is ridden by us. Also have St Anthony's sand dunes less than 1 hour away (go 1-3 times a year). I could definitely see her getting into occasional recreational MX.
Two Wheel Experience: I purchased a NX250 (little Honda Dual Sport) as my first bike three years ago. The intention was to train myself and her, then buy myself a bigger one and hand the little one down to her. She never became super interested. She ended up getting about 10 hours of seat time on-road with it. She has scooted around yards on friends Trail 90's and pit bikes. She did well in both situations. She is confident and enjoys pushing herself.
Offroad: She has ridden three wheelers and currently has an 87 TRX250x. She loves riding her quad, but is seeing the benefits of two wheels. She has been complaining that her quad isn’t powerful enough and would like a bit more suspension.
She drives her turbo Subaru like a mad woman

and refuses to drive vehicles that are automatic, unless it is a truck in off road situations (in which she beats the crud outta them).
So, for her first bike:
KX100: Add FWW, bar risers, and possibly taller seat? Make it a small tossable KDX100. I really like the low weight (easy to handle for a lady and beginner) and decent power (for her to keep from getting bored). Don’t like how she is on the upper limit for size.
KDX: Lower 1-2". I like how it could share parts with mine and that it is a full size bike that I don’t have to adjust. Downside is that she is a beginner and the extra torque and size/weight might be a little intimidating.
I don’t want to pick up an old XR200 in case it poops out while she is learning and I have to put $ into a temp bike. Plus I know once she gets comfortable I can see her getting bored (power) and frustrated (suspension) quick. Since I can find clean KX100 and KDX's for around $1k here and clean XR250 for ~$1k and XR200 for ~$700 Id rather get the better bike for a little more. Any thoughts one way or the other?
Budget is ~$1200
Posted: 12:54 pm Jul 13 2011
by factoryX
kx100 for sure, and you should have cash left over as well.
Posted: 12:58 pm Jul 13 2011
by Mr. Wibbens
Get her a 220

Posted: 02:19 pm Jul 13 2011
by UI Vandal
I have read around various websites about peoples experiences with KX100's. Anyone want to chip in with some first or second hand experience and real world pro/cons? I dont have any friends with them and since I have a KDX I have the real world experience with it. I think I am leaning towards getting her the KX100 and when she wants to step up she can get my KDX200 and I might have to find a KTM300

(bud has one and it is sweeeet).
She would scrape those pink decals off first thing!
Posted: 05:08 pm Jul 13 2011
by spaun
Then just give her your bike and buy the ktm if thats the overall plan anyway.Aint no use in spending money twice.

Posted: 05:11 pm Jul 13 2011
by Mr. Wibbens


UI Vandal wrote:
She would scrape those pink decals off first thing!
Buy her a better razor or just have her wear pants

Posted: 05:23 pm Jul 13 2011
by rbates9
Posted: 09:40 pm Jul 13 2011
by SteveWR450f
Yz 125 or Ktm xc 144. Had a friend with wife who had 05 Yz and it was fun to ride and she was fast.
Posted: 07:39 am Jul 14 2011
by KarlP
I think at 5'6" she'd be O.K. on a stock KDX but just a little big for the KX100. At 140 you'd have to look at the springs on the KX.
She might find the KX100 a little frustrating because it does not have much grunt. Once on the pipe it really goes. I had the head machined and the carb RB'd on ours and it is much better but it is still a 100cc 2-stroke.
Has she spent much time on your KDX?
Posted: 09:03 am Jul 14 2011
by Velocity_Stack
If I were in your shoes, I would adjust the sag on the rear spring and bring it down to her level (a couple of inches), on your KDX that is.
Let her get some seat time and see how she feels about the power and handling.
It only takes a few minutes to adjust it and you can always bring it back up to the original setting when it's all said and done.
If she likes it, then go buy the KTM or scout a KDX for her.
She knows how a turbo feels, but I think the KX is going to hit more like nitrous.
Posted: 09:39 am Jul 14 2011
by fuzzy
Lowering links are cheap, but the KDX is a heavier bike to handle (even though the motor is so forgiving).
Posted: 10:06 am Jul 14 2011
by Griffbones
My .02
The stock KX 100 is under powered for a 140 rider.
The stock cylinder plating in the KX 85 & 100 is very soft and does not last very long. A good replate solves this problem.
You will spend about $200 to re-spring the KX100.
But overall the KX 100 is a very good bike, light weight, though she may feel a little cramped on it depending upon her stature. Same size as a 85 just bigger wheels.
The KDX will have more low end grunt, more ergonomic for an adult, and a nice smooth power band. Down side - may need to be lowered (easy to do), KDX's IMO are a little top heavy and handle like an old school bike, but still very nice in their own right.
You already have the KDX, let her ride it some and see what she thinks before you buy anything, that's free right?
Posted: 06:24 pm Jul 14 2011
by jth
Vandal
I went throu a very similar experience as to yours. My brothers girl friend was very intimidated by the high seat of the KDX. She could not touch the ground flat footed, so we got a 02 KX100. She is a bit big for the KX (same stature as your wife), but the big problem is the lack of low-end power. The bike is good if you’re on the pipe, but way week if you’re not. She is having trouble with hills. If you attack the hill on the pipe and are quick to down shift, it goes good. If you don’t ride it like that, it’s a dog. and she is having trouble.
I am not badmouthing the 100. I understand this is a rider technique problem. It’s a nice bike, just not a good fit for us. IMO a stock 220 lowered would be much better to start. If she wants more power, RB it and she'll leave you eating dust.
Good luck

KX100
Posted: 06:32 pm Jul 14 2011
by Bouillion
My daughter currently rides a 03 RM100 (same bike diff color). She is closer to 5'8" and weights maybe 105. Although she love the bike, in my opinion it is way too small (height wise) for her. We put 3" bar risers and a flywheel weight in it for woods riding but its her knees that practically stick up above the tank. Suspension issue will depend on how hard of a rider she is. Slow to medium trail riding and I doubt she would have any problems?
Funny thing is I offered her the hybrid I built using a 05 KX125 and the 03KDX220 and she won't leave that 100! Maybe if I put some pink plastic on it she's take me up on it?
Posted: 08:50 am Jul 15 2011
by UI Vandal
Went to a friends place for her to get some more seat time. She was riding a TTR225. She said it felt like a little piggy (weight and power). After I told her that both bikes (KX and KDX) have better suspension as well she said "I hope so!" Didn’t get around to putting her on my KDX before she was too tired. Plan on taking her out today after work so she can get a better idea about the powerband/size of mine. A 94 KDX just came up in the local CL for $850. Ideally I would pick up a new KTM for me, but remember the $1200 budget. Don’t see that happening. Secondly, I’d love her to feel comfortable on a full size with lower suspension. The last (safer/shorter term) option is the KX. We'll see and Ill update the wife’s thoughts after her test ride. Maybe Ill contact a local KX ad and see if we could take that for a spin.
Another reason for opting for the lighter bike is she had a L5-S1 titanium rod back fusion this spring. While she thinks she is invincible every once in a while her back lets her know otherwise. I feel that in a technical trail situation having to save a 150 lb bike would be easier than a 230 lb bike. I also keep forgetting that as far as beginner full sized bikes go the KDX is pretty light. There are some who put their wives on dual sports (~300 lb) or those little TTR piggies.
Posted: 09:06 am Jul 15 2011
by scheckaet
the weight is not as important as how high the center of gravity is. I wanted my wife to be on the kdx but even lowered she could not have both feet flat on the ground and she could not keep the bike from tipping over on turns because it is kinda top heavy for her since it's so high. We went for a ttr 125 (she's new to riding)and she likes it. Very low to the ground and light. would not work in your case since your wife is taller and already used to riding.
Posted: 09:07 am Jul 15 2011
by UI Vandal
Yes, I have thought about that. But a KDX at the same height of that TTR225 will have both a lower weight and a lower COG. She was comfortable in putting-mode on that TTR, I just hope she will have the patience to gain experience to get comfortable in a trail situation. She is not a very patient person...
That 94 KDX is out where we will be riding this weekend, I think we'll swing in and check it out. Keep your fingers crossed the wife is comfortable with the idea of a lowered full size!
Posted: 10:10 am Jul 15 2011
by jlove1974
The KX100 will be fine. Also, you won't kill an XR200 no matter what you do do it besides run it out of oil....they are indestructable. But the weight is higher and it's a Honda
A lowered KDX2x0 would be more bike to grow in, so I would go with whatever is cheaper. The KX85/100 has more aftermarket support IMO
Posted: 12:11 pm Jul 15 2011
by gregp
A bit expensive, but probably the best "wife bike" out there right now (although Husqvarna is showing a TE250 "Low"):
http://www.servicehonda.com/honda-2010-models/junior-x
Posted: 12:55 pm Jul 15 2011
by Julien D
Ugh. Get them 4 strokes outta here!
My vote goes to the KDX. The kx100 or a 125 is going to be too pipey.