Page 2 of 2
Posted: 02:17 am Dec 05 2010
by Mr. Wibbens
>|QBB|QBB|QBB<[/url]
KDX4ID wrote:The 220 is better. It has 20 more cc's which makes it bigger... and bigger is better.
I'd take my fat ass on a E series 200 anywhere a 220 could go and probably a lot farther
Little girls ride 220's[/quote]
This girl rides my 220....

[/quote]
Not as good as she rode my big rooster
Posted: 11:13 am Dec 05 2010
by cornishwrecker220
i guess it all depends on where you ride & how you ride...open space areas with lots of wide open throttle then yep the 200 is the faster bike....tight trails & wooded climbs then i`d have a 220 any day as they are tuned for low down grunt straight out of the crate with plenty of traction just when you need it...with the right exhaust, jetting & gearing they`re even better...either bike is a very good motorcycle...just depends on what you want to use it for....p.s i ride a 220 & love it

Posted: 12:00 pm Dec 05 2010
by Julien D
Regardless of the pro 220 arguments, the 200 is a better and more flexible base to build from. It's easier to give a 200 more torque than it is to make the 220 fast.
Posted: 02:09 pm Dec 05 2010
by KDX4ID
>|QBB|QBB|QBB|QBB<[/url]
KDX4ID wrote:The 220 is better. It has 20 more cc's which makes it bigger... and bigger is better.
I'd take my fat ass on a E series 200 anywhere a 220 could go and probably a lot farther
Little girls ride 220's[/quote]
This girl rides my 220....

[/quote]
Not as good as she rode my big rooster[/quote]
What??? My sister has never even met you.

Posted: 03:33 pm Dec 05 2010
by kawagumby


juliend wrote:Regardless of the pro 220 arguments, the 200 is a better and more flexible base to build from. It's easier to give a 200 more torque than it is to make the 220 fast.
My experience, having had several of both bikes, is very much otherwise. I've swapped both aftermarket fmf pipes, reeds, tried head mods, and different jetting...getting the kind of torque out of the H model 200 that the 220 has with its different porting, smaller carb, and a few cc's more, well, not so easy. E model engine is best of both worlds, IMO - but has a more antiquated chassis seemingly more tuned for portly dudes than lean, manly-man woods riders.

Posted: 03:45 pm Dec 05 2010
by Indawoods
Yeah... Ideally, the E series motor is the bomb!
Posted: 07:40 am Dec 06 2010
by KarlP
I wonder if all this answered the OP's question....
Probably so. Either one would be fine, eh?
Posted: 10:02 pm Dec 06 2010
by Green Hornet
Posted: 03:15 am Dec 19 2010
by Brian
Some of you 200 guys are being pretty hard on the 220. Just like the small dog has to yap the most...

Posted: 10:17 am Dec 19 2010
by Indawoods
I'll run your 220... no talk.. just walk.

Posted: 10:38 am Dec 19 2010
by SS109
Posted: 04:32 pm Dec 19 2010
by sped66
Everyone knows it's the RIDER not the BIKE.
Shane Watts would likely mop the floor with any one of us on a bone stock CRF230. (In the woods anyway.)
